Thursday, December 11, 2008

Holy Nietzsche, Batman: Nihilism and The Joker in The Dark Knight

With the release of The Dark Knight on DVD this week, thousands are flocking--myself included--to the nearest Best Buy or Wal-Mart to purchase a copy of the record-breaking film. Comic-based movies have done very well for themselves in recent years and something is to be said for that alone. That is not our most pressing concern however. Instead, we want to raise the question, "What makes The Dark Knight surpass the rest in terms of critical review, box-office intake, and general popularity?" I'll give you one hint: it begins with a "Joke" and ends with an "Err."

While its quality in many areas plays a supplemental role in the huge success of the first sequel in the latest Batman series, the Caped Crusader himself is not the character whom audiences are left talking about. Rather than the hero, it's the villain who has captured the minds and hearts of viewers. This isn't just any villain though; it's The Joker, the antithesis of not only all things heroic but all things meaningful. He has no tangible incentive for his actions and in his mind has nothing to lose. The Joker is a man who, as Michael Caine's character Alfred Pennyworth puts it, "just wants to watch the world burn."

The Joker character stands as a symbol for full-blown nihilism. Most commonly associated with the writings of Friedrich Nietzsche, nihilism is the philosophy that the world is devoid of any meaning, standards, values, and purpose. Existence is pointless, in other words. In an August blog post titled "Why is Batman Making So Much Money?," theologian C. Michael Patton described The Joker as "the Nihilist who believes in nothing, cares for nothing, and pursues nothing." Precisely. Patton continues:

At one point The Joker says, “I have no plans. I am like a dog chasing a car. I would not know what to do if I caught it.” There is no rationalism because there is no such thing as order, reason, or ends that create purpose. It is just the moment, and the moment is ruled by randomness.

In other words, "I just do things," The Joker explains in the same scene. Why would such a blatant display of anarchy and utter recklessness prove appealing in today's culture? Patton speculates that the impulse to find nihilistic behavior entertaining stems from postmodern thinking. He writes, "Our postmodern culture may see itself in the character of The Joker. Like a person who has not seen his face in many years, we are going to the mirror to take a look."

With its rampant embrace of moral relativism and existential thought, our postmodern culture sees what it is becoming in The Joker. Once people realize that if every individual determines the truth for himself, the inevitable conclusion is that there is no all-encompassing unity to reality. Thus, existence is unintelligible and pointless. All is nothingness since there is no absolute standard or transcendent meaning. If everyone sets the truth, there is no actual truth since no person's perception or interpretation of reality takes precedence over another's.

This type of thinking will undoubtedly lead to despair and from despair to apathy, as Patton notes.

It is when the despair turns to apathy and we are what we are and we don’t care what we become. With the deconstruction of morals, truth, knowledge, revelation, and the like, is it any surprise that so many people are going to look in the mirror?

Moreover, we must admit most pre-teen, adolescent, and 20-something males are not infatuated by Heath Ledger's portrayal of The Joker because they are conscious of the implications of postmodernism. Our attraction to the character is more basic than that. The Joker was not the first to ask, "Why so serious?" Such a question was not first posed in Gotham, but rather in the Garden. It came with the Serpent asking Eve, "Hath God said?" (Gen 3:1). The temptation to create our own rules and define reality for ourselves was appealing to us then and proves to be more so now this side of the Fall.

Aware that mankind's tendency is to rebel against its Creator, Christians are to call persons to repentance, reminding them that we as creatures made in God's image are not our own. As Francis Schaeffer stated, "We must never forget that the first part of the gospel is not 'Accept Christ as Savior,' but 'God is there.'" Only the infinite, personal creator Yahweh can assign meaning to the universe, thus making it possible for human beings to reason and interpret things. Furthermore, God's existence not only necessitates that he is the One to Whom we look for meaning and purpose as revealed in his Word, but that he is the One to Whom we are accountable.

Patton is right. Our culture does see itself in The Joker--and we all should if we're honest about the condition of our hearts (Jer 17:9). Nevertheless, this is not something we should embrace or celebrate. This represents humanity gone wrong. In knowing that "God is there," we are to be ready to engage a culture of emptiness and rebelliousness.

Why so serious? Because this is no laughing matter.

Monday, December 8, 2008

A Seasonal Question


So, right now I work retail at a "Christian book store" in a big city. We sell a lot of questionable things, including Santa here, kneeling before the manger. Some even have a little prayer, in which Santa acknowledges to Jesus that He is the source of all gifts and that His gift on the cross is Santa's inspiration for giving.
-
So, when the store is empty, I get to stand up front and think about things like this. Naturally, I have a few thoughts and questions to pass on for your imput.
-
1. Why, in the WORLD, would you want to put Santa and Jesus together? You're putting the God of all creation, in His amazing act of accomodating us in His incarnation, right there next to a fictional old man. You might as well paint a picture of Harry Potter and Edward Cullen coming to Elijah's rescue as the three of them duke it out with the prophets of Baal. What happens to the child who sees this atrocity, once he realizes the truth about Jolly Ole Saint Nick? Does he throw our Lord Jesus out as fiction as well? This article has a revealing exceprt of a dialogue in such a case. It makes me sick that these things exist, and even sicker when a customer brings one to my line, knowing that I must ring it out.
-
2. This is the more important one. This one has been bugging me for a couple days now. The word "Christmas" comes from "Christ's mass." "Christ's mass" became "Christ mass," which became "Christmas." There is also a "Michaelmas," in case you were wondering.
-
Is it ok to say the word "Christmas?" Think about it for a minute. Think about where the word came from, and whose name it still contains. Christ is the Greek form of the title Messiah-a title of our Lord Jesus Himself ("Messiah" comes from the Hebrew word that means "to smear" or "to annoint.") Do we need a mass for the Annointed One of God-the God-man?
-
Moreover, when we throw around the word "Christmas," are we taking the Lord's name in vain? To be sure, it isn't intentional, but it is still Jesus' title. In fact, it is the only title so closely associated with a name that it is often confused with the name itself. (I recall when I was younger asking my grandmother what Jesus' middle name was, since I was sure His last name was Christ.)
-
In saying "Merry Christmas," have I thrown around my savior's divine title as a simple greeting? Do I treat that name with reverance when I sing "We Wish you a Merry Christmas?" I don't think I do. Most people agree that using the word "Christ" as an expletive is taking the Lord's name in vain. But is it any different how we treat it during the holidays? I guess a helpful thought would be to ask if the word "Christmas is far-enough removed from "Christ" to make a difference.
-
Maybe "Happy Holidays" isn't so bad after all.
-
Just some thoughts, I'd love to hear your opinions,
-Elijah

Tuesday, November 25, 2008

Psalm 121 - Thanksgiving to God for His help

1I lift up my eyes to the hills. From where does my help come?

2 My help comes from the LORD, who made heaven and earth.

3He will not let your foot be moved; he who keeps you will not slumber.

4Behold, he who keeps Israel will neither slumber nor sleep.

5The LORD is your keeper; the LORD is your shade on your right hand.

6 The sun shall not strike you by day, nor the moon by night.

7The LORD will keep you from all evil; he will keep your life.

8The LORD will keep your going out and your coming in from this time forth and forevermore.

Wednesday, November 12, 2008

Outside attacks against God - Buses seem to be the trend


http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,450445,00.html

As you may recall a few weeks ago, we discussed an atheist group launching a "anti-God" campaign on London passenger buses. Well, where is someone riding through the streets of America today saying, "The British are coming!" Because that same campaign has launched in Washington DC.

My favorite quote from this news report is:

Edwords said the purpose isn't to argue that God doesn't exist or change minds about a deity, although "we are trying to plant a seed of rational thought and critical thinking and questioning in people's minds."

Seems to me that these people are falling exactly into the Romans 1 mentality yet again.

28And since they did not see fit to acknowledge God, God gave them up to a debased mind to do what ought not to be done.

My prayer is that as someone reads those ads, a true Christian will use that to preach Christ and true repentance to someone.

Wednesday, November 5, 2008

"Blessed be the name of the LORD."

Many times we as Christians overlook small details in Bible "stories" that hold profound truth about ourselves and, more importantly, about God.

Take, for instance, Job's children. The book of Job outlines the story of their demise:

Job 1:18 - 19 states:

While he was yet speaking, there came another and said, "Your sons and daughters were eating and drinking wine in their oldest brother’s house, and behold, a great wind came across the wilderness and struck the four corners of the house, and it fell upon the young people, and they are dead, and I alone have escaped to tell you."

We don't know much about Job's children other then these facts: they liked to party. Job 1:4 says, "His sons used to go and hold a feast in the house of each one on his day, and they would send and invite their three sisters to eat and drink with them."

We also know that Job was a concerned Father. He worried that their lifestyle would lead them astray. Job 1:5 outlines Job's prayers and concerns with his kids: "And when the days of the feast had run their course, Job would send and consecrate them, and he would rise early in the morning and offer burnt offerings according to the number of them all. For Job said, "It may be that my children have sinned, and cursed God in their hearts." Thus Job did continually."

Note that Job did this "continually" - always worried about his children as any good parent should. He was terrified that God would punish his children for their "lifestyle" or even their "thoughts" so he offered prayers for their safety and for their hearts to be right before God.

Given that "back story"(as it were), one might believe that Job would be upset with the events around their death: Upset either with them, thinking they had sinned, or with God, for destroying them.

But he was neither. Job 1:20 - 22 relates how Job reacted:

Then Job arose and tore his robe and shaved his head and fell on the ground and worshiped. And he said, "Naked I came from my mother’s womb, and naked shall I return. The LORD gave, and the LORD has taken away; blessed be the name of the LORD." In all this Job did not sin or charge God with wrong.

Note verse 22: "In all this Job did not sin or charge God with wrong."

Job responded in a very godly way. Knowing that this could happen, knowing that his kids were not living correctly, knowing that God is to be "feared" (Job 1:1), Job reacted strangely by worldly standards.

We know the rest of the story of Job, but did you catch the one little bit of glory from the life of Job's kids. Whether they were doing wrong or doing right, they were created for this purpose. God wanted to receive glory from their lives through their father's honoring of God as God. They were created to die this horrible death: Predestined as it were.

Even in the Old Testament story of Job, we see what the apostle Paul was telling the Roman believers in Romans 11:33 - 36:

Oh, the depth of the riches and wisdom and knowledge of God! How unsearchable are his judgments and how inscrutable his ways! "For who has known the mind of the Lord, or who has been his counselor?" "Or who has given a gift to him that he might be repaid?" For from him and through him and to him are all things. To him be glory forever. Amen.

Many people focus on Job through this book and rightly so. But don't miss out on the messages sent in just a few verses of God's Word: Everything is to God's Glory!

Thursday, October 30, 2008

Gospel Urgency

From the "Pulpit" online blog of the Sheperd's Fellowship:

http://www.sfpulpit.com/


Gospel Urgency
October 27th, 2008

(By Richard Baxter)

Oh, if you have the hearts of Christians or of men in you, let them yearn towards your poor ignorant, ungodly neighbours. Alas, there is but a step betwixt them and death and hell; many hundred diseases are waiting ready to seize on them, and if they die unregenerate, they are lost forever.

Have you hearts of rock, that cannot pity men in such a case as this? If you believe not the Word of God, and the danger of sinners, why are you Christians yourselves? If you do believe it, why do you not bestir yourself to the helping of others? Do you not care who is damned, so you be saved? If so, you have sufficient cause to pity yourselves, for it is a frame of spirit utterly inconsistent with grace. . . .

Dost thou live close by them, or meet them in the streets, or labour with them, or travel with them, or sit and talk with them, and say nothing to them of their souls, or the life to come? If their houses were on fire, thou wouldst run and help them; and wilt thou not help them when their souls are almost at the fire of hell?

(Cited in I. D. E. Thomas, A Puritan Golden Treasury [Edinburgh: Banner of Truth, 1977], 92–93)

As this Thanksgiving and Christmas season approaches, let us be thankful to God for our salvation and let us share the Gift of Christ to others around us.

Thursday, October 23, 2008

Should Your Next Pastor Be a Calvinist?

Tom J. Nettles, professor of Historical Theology at the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, thinks so.

In the Winter 2008 Founders Journal (www.founders.org), Nettles argues that Calvinist pastors are most appropriate for preserving the historic doctrines of the Christian faith among Southern Baptist churches. Because of their theological commitment to the Doctrines of Grace, Calvinist pastors will strive to maintain conservative doctrines--such as biblical inerrancy and penal substitutionary atonement and so forth--that the vast majority of Southern Baptists have in common. Nettles summarizes why Calvinists are healthy for our churches:

If a church, therefore, gets a Calvinist preacher, she will get a good thing. Several issues will be settled forever and the church will not have to wonder about the soundness of her preacher on these items of biblical truth and their soul-nurturing power. Calvinists have stood for more than just their distinguishing doctrines, but have held steadfastly to other doctrines that are essential for the health of Baptist churches in our day.

In addition to inspiration and substitution, Nettles elaborates that Calvinists will maintain historic Baptist stances on issues such as the doctrine of the Trinity, missions and evangelism, Christ-centered preaching, the holiness of Christian life, regenerate church membership, and religious liberty. As we have personally experienced, the irony is that nowadays SBC churches are extremely leery of Calvinism. However, the fact remains that the Convention was founded upon these very doctrines. Nettles notes this at the article's outset. He says, "Today, however, some Southern Baptists are warning the churches against [Calvinists]. This is a mammoth historical irony that many find difficult to appreciate."

For the entire article, visit the Founders Journal online (click here).